Sunday, July 11, 2010 at 7:35PM The debut edition of The Tom Sullivan Show on Fox Business includes an interview with former Under Secretary of Homeland Security and Director of FEMA, Michael Brown
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 11:14AM Watch and ask yourself, is there someone like this running in my congressional district? If not, why not?
Tuesday, May 4, 2010 at 10:28PM
Taking Advantage of an Oil Crisis
By Brian Sussman
Days after being elected in November 2008, President-Elect Barack Obama's Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, spoke to a Wall Street Journal gathering of business leaders and stated that the economic crisis facing the United States is "an opportunity to do things you could not do before."
"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste," Emanuel said.
And why should we think this administration isn't letting the Gulf of Mexico oil crisis go to waste?
Don't be fooled for a moment. History proves that the Gulf leak is a messy dream come true for hardcore environmentalists -- -many of whom surround Mr. Obama.
Travel back in time to the 1969 oil spill of the coast of Santa Barbara. A Union Oil drilling platform six miles off the coast sprang a leak, allowing hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude oil to seep into the Pacific and wash ashore. The cameras of the world's media rushed to the scene to focus on oil-coated birds stuck in muck. The newly hatched ecology propagandists soaked it up.
The nation's first outspoken congressional environmentalist, Wisconsin Senator Gaylord Nelson, immediately flew to California to see the crisis for himself. An anti-capitalism Democrat, Nelson returned to Washington angered at the oil industry, vowing, we're told, "to do something to wake America up."
Nelson's friend, Stanford Professor Paul Ehrlich, worked vigorously with the senator to make the Santa Barbara spill a major national issue. Of course, Ehrlich's longtime friend and associate John Holdren is now Barack Obama's handpicked Science and Technology advisor.
Emotions still run high in ultra-liberal Santa Barbara over the 1969 leak. Even today, as black, marble-sized balls of coagulated crude are often found interspersed on the beaches of Santa Barbara, deceptive local activists will direct naïve eyes toward the oil platforms offshore, fervently declaring that capitalism and big oil are to blame for the tar balls on their sand. But this observation is total fraud. There is so much oil just beneath the ocean floor off Santa Barbara that the black gold is constantly seeping into the open waters at a rate of up to 170 barrels per day.
However, thanks to persistent environmentalists, that 1969 event has kept further oil and gas exploration and development off-limits on the west coast to this day.
Twenty years later, in 1989, the Exxon-Valdez oil tanker ran aground in Alaska, creating the largest oil spill in U.S. history. (By the way, at the current rate of flow, the Gulf leak will not surpass the amount of oil discharged in the Valdez accident for about a month and a half.) Keep in mind that the Valdez accident had nothing to do with an oil rig or platform -- it was caused by the extremely poor judgment of the ship's captain.
Nonetheless, the freak accident was successfully used by environmentalists to place massive swaths of Alaska off-limits to the oil and gas industry. It wasn't until 2007, when the Bush administration lifted a long-standing moratorium on drilling in Alaska's Bristol Bay, that oil companies were granted access to begin plans to harvest the 230 million barrels of oil and natural gas liquids -- plus the 6.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas -- in that remote corner of the Arctic.
However, despite the fact that there have been no leaks, spills, or errors by the oil companies working Alaska since 1989, President Obama reversed the 2007 Bush decision, shutting the lid on the Bristol Bay oil fields.
Now we have the 2010 Gulf spill. Judging by the past, I predict that this crisis will be effectively used by the Obama administration and environmentalists to prevent harvesting fossil resources from the Gulf for decades to come.
Additionally, one has to wonder why team Obama moved so slowly in responding to this situation. Certainly their gross inaction allowed the leak to grow into a full-blown disaster. Just look at the timeline of events (hat tip to deepseanews):
Tuesday, April 20. While finishing a well project for British Petroleum (BP), a Transocean rig called the Deepwater Horizon explodes and catches fire approximately 42 miles Southeast of Venice, Louisiana. U.S. Coast Guard District Eight command center receives report at approximately 10 p.m. Of the 126 people on board at the time of the explosion, 115 crewmembers were accounted for. Search begins for missing 11.
Thursday, April 22. The fire rages. A second explosion occurs, causing the rig to sink.
Friday, April 23. Search for missing crew members is suspended. The oil slick grows.
Saturday, April 24. Remotely operated vehicles discover that oil is escaping from two leaks in a drilling pipe about 5,000 feet below the surface. The leaks appear to be releasing 1,000 barrels a day.
Sunday, April 25. The oil slick now covers 600 square miles and is about 70 miles south of the Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana coastlines.
Tuesday, April 27. Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal takes action and requests Coast Guard set up protected booms near several wildlife refuges. Meantime, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar say they are expanding the government's investigation of the explosion that caused the disaster.
Wednesday, April 28. The slick nears to 20 miles east of the mouth of the Mississippi River. BP states a controlled test to burn the leaking oil was successful late Wednesday afternoon.
Thursday, April 29. Governor Jindal declares a state of emergency, and the federal government sends in skimmers and booms to prevent environmental damage.
President Obama says that BP is "ultimately responsible for funding ... cleanup operations." Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) immediately drafts legislation to suspend any plan for further offshore exploration and drilling until a full investigation of the disaster and the development of new protocols are developed.
Friday, April 30. Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) follows Senator Nelson's lead and calls for immediate hearings with BP executives.
Sunday, May 2. Twelve days after the initial disaster began, President Obama flies to the Gulf coast and delivers a speech. Janet Napolitano blames delays on government response on fairy-tales: "Mother Nature has not exactly been friendly," she told ABC News.
Now we discover that if U.S. officials had followed up on a federal Gulf oil cleanup plan crafted in 1994, it is possible that the spill could have been kept under control and far from land. However, the feds did not have a single cleanup boom on hand. (The booms are made of flame-retardant fabric and have two pumps that push water through its 500-foot length; two boats tow the U-shaped boom through an oil slick, gathering up about 75,000 gallons of oil at a time, and that oil is dragged away from the larger spill and ignited.)
Instead, we've learned that eight days after the initial explosion, officials had to purchase a boom from a company in Illinois.
According the Mobile Press Register,
In the days after the rig sank, U.S Coast Guard Rear Admiral Mary Landry said the government had all the assets it needed. She did not discuss why officials waited more than a week to conduct a test burn.
At the time, former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration oil spill response coordinator Ron Gouguet -- who helped craft the 1994 plan -- told the Press-Register that officials had pre-approval for burning. "The whole reason the plan was created was so we could pull the trigger right away."
Gouguet speculated that burning could have captured 95 percent of the oil as it spilled from the well.
The foot-dragging Obama administration and inept federal agents have allowed an environmental disaster to fester. The only leader who seems to be taking a proactive stance is Governor Jindal.
Meantime, environmental activists of all stripes will seize this crisis as a greasy, golden opportunity and use it to shut off access to America's natural resources, I predict, for decades to come.
Brian Sussman is author of the new bestseller Climategate: a veteran meteorologist exposes the global warming scam.
Read this article and others at The American Thinker.
Michael Brown
Over at powerlineblog.com John Hinderaker makes a great point about today's press briefing with Robert Gibbs a the White House: At Robert Gibbs's press briefing today, not a single reporter asked a question about the government's failure to have equipment available to carry out its "plan" for responding to major oil spills in the Gulf.
And we wonder why there is such disdain for the media?
Check out Powerline.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010 at 9:38PM Let's recap the previous thirty hours.
On Neil Cavuto's show on Fox News, shown below, I talked about how the Obama Administration delayed their response to the oil crisis in the Gulf of Mexico. Apparently I hit a nerve because today Robert Gibbs, White House Press Secretary, had to chastise Fox News for having me on their shows and completely mischaracterized what I said to Neil Cavuto.
This White House is becoming infamous, almost Nixonian, in its disdain and disapproval of Free Speech and differing opinions. Here is what I believe the offending statement that has Robert Gibbs (and Anderson Cooper and Chris Matthews and a whole host of left-leaning commentators and reporters) upset with Fox News. This is taken verbatim from the Fox News website transcript:
This [emphasis added] is exactly what they want, because now he can pander to the environmentalists and say, "I’m going to shut it down because It’s too dangerous," while Mexico and China and everybody else drills in the Gulf. We’re going to get shut down.
Anderson Cooper and Robert Gibbs take the position that the word "this" refers to my description of this oil potentially spreading throughout the gulf's shoreline and possibly around Florida. Why? Because here is the preceding paragraph from the same interview:
No, no. Look, Bill Nelson — and, you know, they don’t say these things without it being coordinated. And so now you’re looking at this oil slick approaching, you know, the Louisiana shore, according to certain — NOAA and other places, if the winds are right, it will go up the East Coast.
Gibbs would like to tie the word "this" to "it will go up the East Coast." Disingenuous at best, as the "this" referred to in the interview with Neil is the Deepwater Horizon leak, the crisis, the oil spill, not the results of the oil spill itself. That much is clear from listening to the original interview and subsequent interviews.
But the White House, again using the Rahm Emanuel Rule No. 1 of politics, "never let a crisis go wasted" now attacks Fox News for having me on Neil Cavuto's show and completely misquotes me from the podium in the Brady Briefing Room of the West Wing. Here's Robert Gibbs:
"the special and unique interview with Michael Brown, who for those who weren’t let in on the big secret... intimated on Fox — and it wasn’t, didn’t appear to be, pushed back on real hard — that this spill was leaked on purpose in order for us to undo decisions."
Read more here.
Amazing. Gibbs claims I said "this spill was leaked on purpose in order for us to undo decisions." Mr. Gibbs, you are unequivocally incorrect. This radio show host has never said that President Obama or this Administration caused the leak. Frankly, I don't give you that much credit, any more than I would give credit to the other wild-eyed Bush-haters who claimed we blew up the levees in New Orleans. Government is not that competent. Frankly, Robert, I think you have my comments confused with others who may have appeared on the Fox News Channel, but it's your responsibility to straighten it out.
I must have hit a nerve with the Cavuto interview for Robert Gibbs to mention me at a press gaggle.
As I have reiterated with Politico, I stand by my original statement: this White House, Democrats in general, are using this crisis to limit offshore drilling. First, the President suspended offshore drilling until the cause of this accident was resolved.
Seriously?
Thousands of wells are pumping in Gulf of Mexico (some of which belong to China, Mexico and Venezuela, who are determined to drill and maintain their energy security, unlike us) and one accident results in a suspension of drilling?
Imagine the costs of that. Soon you won't have to, you'll see it at the gas pump.
But after eleven deaths, millions of dollars, the commitment of huge federal, state and corporate resources, the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee uses the crisis to appeal for supporters to help the President. On their DSCC website you find this:
As the enormous oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico threatens beaches, wildlife and livelihoods, the Obama Administration has vowed to “keep a boot on the throat” of BP and hold them accountable. Meanwhile, Republican leader Rush Limbaugh has spoken for the right-wing, saying there’s no need to clean up the spill because “the ocean will take care of this on its own.”
Sign our petition. Stand with President Obama to hold BP accountable for this disastrous spill. Rush Limbaugh is entirely wrong: This oil will not clean itself up. Corporations must be held accountable for their actions, and the right wing must stop making excuses for environmental bad actors.
Yes, one should never let a crisis go to waste.
As the President's Chief of Staff says:
“Rule one: Never allow a crisis to go to waste,” Mr. Emanuel said in an interview on Sunday. “They are opportunities to do big things.”
Remember, this White House abhors our reliance on carbon-based energy and wants to see energy prices skyrocket and industries go bankrupt:
A President who wants to bankrupt a legitimate American company! And I'm supposed to keep quiet and now express my view that this White House sees an opportunity to limit offshore drilling?
As I said to Glenn Thrush at Politico:
Brown also likened the White House strategy of holding BP accountable for damages to that of anti-nuclear activists who rallied around the cause of industry whistle blower Karen Silkwood, who died under mysterious circumstances in 1974.
“It is an over reaction,” he said of the administration’s decision to suspend new exploration drilling pending a safety review of existing drilling platforms.
Read more here.
Monday, May 3, 2010 at 11:24PM Neil Cavuto, Fox Business: Is the Media Giving BHO a pass on its response to BP America spill in the Gulf of Mexico?
